The Subterfuge of Syrian Chemical Weapons - UK Indymedia

The Subterfuge of Syrian Chemical Weapons - UK Indymedia

...Some times before the military industrial banking complex starts these wars we get to glimpse the lies behind the media spin.For those who search the alternative and social media, many glimpses are seen of the lies and propaganda.
How many times will we fall for this set up,where were the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

To attack with a war off aggression, another sovereign nation is against International law.

There is no justification in International law.they claim humanitarian intervention a precedent has been set since Kosovo,yet the UN did not give any resolution to go in ,the decision was made by NATO.

I was shocked to hear recently that the fascist regime of Hitlers Nazis claimed it was a humanitarian Intervention in Poland,also Mussolini claimed humanitarian intervention in Abyssinia.

Interesting quotes from the linked Indymedia article .

. "The fact that this UN mission is in Syria in response to an official request sent by the Syrian government to the UN Security Council on March 19, 2013 to investigate the first chemical attack, which was launched then from the positions of the U.S. – sponsored armed gangs fighting the Syrian regime on the government – held northern town of Khan al_A’ssal, as well as the fact that the U.S. for five months opposed such an investigation unless the UN adopts it as an “inspection” mission all over Syria, are self – evident enough facts to leave no doubt about the real intentions of the United States."

"
In view of the Syrian government’s confirmation of the use of chemical weapons, Kerry’s statement on Monday that it “is real, that chemical weapons were used in Syria,” and the confirmation of their use by the Syrian so called “opposition” and its western and Arab sponsors, their use is already a forgone conclusion.

Is it not surprising and a waste of time then to send the UN independent commission of inquiry to investigate a forgone conclusion that all parties take for granted as a fact!

Kerry quoted Ban Ki - moon as saying last week that “the U.N. investigation will not determine who used these chemical weapons, only whether such weapons were used.”

If the investigators’ mandate is only to confirm what is already “is undeniable,” in Kerry’s words, why were the UN investigators stripped of the mandate of determining “who” used the chemical weapons in Syria, if not to leave it up to the U.S. & partners to decide in advance as a prejudged conclusion that “There's no doubt who is responsible: The Syrian regime,” according to Vice President Joe Biden on Wednesday, to be consistent with their plans for a regime change in Damascus, and let the truth go to hell."